When your topic branch modifies an overlapping area that your master branch (or upstream) touched since
your topic branch forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, even before your topic
branch is ready to be pushed upstream:
o---*---o topic
/
o---o---o---*---o---o master
For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. One way to do it is to pull master into the
topic branch:
$ git switch topic
$ git merge master
o---*---o---+ topic
/ /
o---o---o---*---o---o master
The commits marked with * touch the same area in the same file; you need to resolve the conflicts when
creating the commit marked with +. Then you can test the result to make sure your work-in-progress still
works with what is in the latest master.
After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work on the topic. The easiest is to build on
top of the test merge commit +, and when your work in the topic branch is finally ready, pull the topic
branch into master, and/or ask the upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or the
upstream might have been advanced since the test merge +, in which case the final commit graph would look
like this:
$ git switch topic
$ git merge master
$ ... work on both topic and master branches
$ git switch master
$ git merge topic
o---*---o---+---o---o topic
/ / \
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master
When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch would end up having many such "Merge
from master" commits on it, which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. Readers of the
Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus complained about such too frequent test merges when a
subsystem maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges".
As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test merges, you could blow away the test merge, and
keep building on top of the tip before the test merge:
$ git switch topic
$ git merge master
$ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge
$ ... work on both topic and master branches
$ git switch master
$ git merge topic
o---*---o-------o---o topic
/ \
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master
This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is finally ready and merged into the master
branch. This merge would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the commits marked with *.
However, this conflict is often the same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you blew
away. gitrerere helps you resolve this final conflicted merge using the information from your earlier
hand resolve.
Running the gitrerere command immediately after a conflicted automerge records the conflicted working
tree files, with the usual conflict markers <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> in them. Later, after you are
done resolving the conflicts, running gitrerere again will record the resolved state of these files.
Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of master into the topic branch.
Next time, after seeing the same conflicted automerge, running gitrerere will perform a three-way merge
between the earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and the current conflicted
automerge. If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written out to your working tree file,
so you do not have to manually resolve it. Note that gitrerere leaves the index file alone, so you still
need to do the final sanity checks with gitdiff (or gitdiff-c) and gitadd when you are satisfied.
As a convenience measure, gitmerge automatically invokes gitrerere upon exiting with a failed automerge
and gitrerere records the hand resolve when it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand resolve
when it is not. gitcommit also invokes gitrerere when committing a merge result. What this means is
that you do not have to do anything special yourself (besides enabling the rerere.enabled config
variable).
In our example, when you do the test merge, the manual resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when
you do the actual merge later with the updated master and topic branch, as long as the recorded
resolution is still applicable.
The information gitrerere records is also used when running gitrebase. After blowing away the test
merge and continuing development on the topic branch:
o---*---o-------o---o topic
/
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master
$ git rebase master topic
o---*---o-------o---o topic
/
o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master
you could run gitrebasemastertopic, to bring yourself up to date before your topic is ready to be sent
upstream. This would result in falling back to a three-way merge, and it would conflict the same way as
the test merge you resolved earlier. gitrerere will be run by gitrebase to help you resolve this
conflict.
[NOTE] gitrerere relies on the conflict markers in the file to detect the conflict. If the file already
contains lines that look the same as lines with conflict markers, gitrerere may fail to record a
conflict resolution. To work around this, the conflict-marker-size setting in gitattributes(5) can be
used.