logo
Free, unlimited AI code reviews that run on commit
git-lrc git-lrc GitHub Install Now We'd appreciate a star git-lrc - Free, unlimited AI code reviews that run on commit | Product Hunt git-lrc - Free, unlimited AI code reviews that run on commit | Product Hunt

shard-protocol-node-interface

Provides a standardized Remote Procedure Call (RPC) gateway for interacting with the Shardeum distributed ledger technology (DLT), enabling programmatic access to core data structures like ledger entries, transaction records, and account states, while incorporating comprehensive fault tolerance mechanisms.

Author

shard-protocol-node-interface logo

abdulazeem-tk4vr

No License

Quick Info

GitHub GitHub Stars 0
NPM Weekly Downloads 0
Tools 1
Last Updated 2026-02-19

Tags

shardeumrpcapisshardeum blockchainshardeum mcprpc methods

MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge

Verified on MseeP

Shardeum Node Abstraction Layer

License: MIT Shardeum Node.js

smithery badge


🌐 Conceptual Overview

This Shardeum Model Context Protocol (MCP) Service functions as a critical middleware component, exposing a unified interface for blockchain interactions on the Shardeum ecosystem via established RPC conventions. It empowers autonomous agents, application backends, and development tooling to fetch immutable data and initiate verifiable operations against the ledger.

✨ Core Capabilities

  • Full RPC Method Coverage
  • Adherence to Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) standards
  • Inclusion of Shardeum-specific operational calls
  • Versatile Data Retrieval
  • Seamless Integration with Intelligent Systems
  • Robust Network Connectivity Management
  • Advanced Exception and Failure Management

🛠️ Exposed Functionality

Standardized Ethereum RPC Endpoints

  • Block Querying

  • eth_blockNumber

  • eth_getBlockByHash
  • eth_getBlockByNumber
  • eth_getBlockReceipts

  • Transaction Operations

  • eth_getTransactionCount

  • eth_getTransactionByHash
  • eth_getTransactionByBlockHashAndIndex
  • eth_getTransactionByBlockNumberAndIndex
  • eth_getTransactionReceipt

  • State Inspection

  • eth_getBalance
  • eth_estimateGas
  • eth_chainId

Shardeum Native Protocols

  • shardeum_getNodeList
  • shardeum_getNetworkAccount
  • shardeum_getCycleInfo

📦 System Requirements

  • Runtime Environment: Node.js version 18.x or later
  • Foundational knowledge of distributed ledger concepts

Integration Guide (via Cursor)

  1. Obtain the source code repository and execute dependency resolution (npm install).
  2. Launch the Cursor IDE.
  3. Navigate to the configuration panel for Cursor Settings.
  4. Locate the section designated for "MCP" functionality.
  5. Select the option to "Add new MCP server".
  6. Input the subsequent configuration object:
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shm-mcp": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": [
        "path_to\shardeum-mcp-server\index.js"
      ]
    }
  }
}

🔍 Operational Examples

Checking Account Value

Sample prompts for the consuming application:

  • "Determine the token reserve held at address 0x1234... on the Shardeum chain."
  • "Fetch the current ETH valuation for this specific ledger address."

Examining Transaction History

  • "Retrieve the complete record associated with transaction ID 0x5678..."
  • "Perform an analysis of the most recently finalized block sequence."

🤝 Development Contributions

  1. Fork the primary repository.
  2. Establish a dedicated feature branch.
  3. Commit substantive modifications.
  4. Propagate commits to your remote branch.
  5. Submit a formal Pull Request for review.

📄 Configuration Notes

To point the service towards an alternative RPC gateway, modify the assigned value of the rpcUrl constant within the source code.

🐛 Debugging Assistance

  • Confirm Node.js version compliance (must be 18+).
  • Validate active network connectivity.
  • Verify the operational status of the configured RPC endpoint.
  • Ensure you are running the most current release of the software.

🗺️ Future Development Trajectory

  • [ ] Extend compatibility to encompass supplementary blockchain environments.
  • [ ] Implement write capabilities for transaction submission.
  • [ ] Refine and elevate error reporting granularity.
  • [ ] Optimize execution throughput and latency.
  • [ ] Broaden the scope of integrated functionalities.

📊 Supported Environments

  • Shardeum Local Testnet Instance
  • Further environments planned for inclusion soon.

WIKIPEDIA: XMLHttpRequest (XHR) is an Application Programming Interface (API) implemented as a JavaScript object whose methods facilitate the transmission of HTTP requests from a web browser environment to a designated web server. These methods permit browser-based applications to dispatch requests to the server post-page load completion, and subsequently receive resultant data. XMLHttpRequest is foundational to the Ajax programming paradigm. Before Ajax, the primary means for server interaction involved conventional hyperlink navigation and HTML form submissions, actions that typically caused the current viewport content to be entirely replaced by new content.

== Evolution == The fundamental concept underpinning XMLHttpRequest originated in 2000, conceived by Microsoft Outlook's development team. This notion was subsequently realized within Internet Explorer version 5 (released in 1999). Critically, the initial syntax did not utilize the standardized XMLHttpRequest identifier. Instead, developers invoked COM objects via ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP") or ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"). By the time Internet Explorer 7 arrived (2006), all major browsers had adopted the formal XMLHttpRequest identifier. The XMLHttpRequest identifier has since become the undisputed convention across all mainstream web rendering engines, including Mozilla's Gecko (2002), Safari 1.2 (2004), and Opera 8.0 (2005).

=== Formal Standardization === The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) issued the initial Working Draft specification for the XMLHttpRequest object on April 5, 2006. A subsequent Level 2 specification was published by the W3C on February 25, 2008. Level 2 introduced enhancements such as mechanisms for tracking request progress events, enabling cross-site data transfer, and handling raw byte streams. Near the close of 2011, the Level 2 features were merged back into the primary specification document. At the end of 2012, development stewardship transitioned to the WHATWG, which now maintains the living document, primarily utilizing Web IDL notation.

== Operational Workflow == Executing a network query using XMLHttpRequest generally necessitates adherence to several sequential programming stages:

Instantiate an XMLHttpRequest object via its constructor call: Invoke the open() method to define the request modality (e.g., GET/POST), specify the target resource URI, and determine whether the operation should be synchronous or asynchronous: For operations configured as asynchronous, establish an event handler function designed to be triggered upon subsequent state transitions of the request: Commence the actual data transmission by calling the send() method, potentially passing payload data: Monitor the state changes within the registered event handler. If the server successfully delivers response data, this payload is, by default, stored in the responseText attribute. When the object completes its processing cycle, its state transitions to 4, signifying the "done" status. Beyond these fundamental steps, XMLHttpRequest offers numerous configuration parameters to control request transmission behavior and response processing logic. Custom HTTP headers can be prepended to the request to guide server fulfillment, and arbitrary data can be uploaded by including it in the send() invocation. The retrieved payload can be deserialized from JSON format into a native, readily consumable JavaScript structure, or alternatively, processed incrementally as the data arrives rather than waiting for the entire stream to buffer. Furthermore, the request execution can be terminated prematurely or configured with a timeout limit to prevent indefinite waiting.

== Cross-Origin Communication ==

In the nascent stages of the World Wide Web, it became apparent that mechanisms allowing unrestricted communication between different security domains posed significant r

See Also

`