logo
Free, unlimited AI code reviews that run on commit
git-lrc git-lrc GitHub Install Now We'd appreciate a star git-lrc - Free, unlimited AI code reviews that run on commit | Product Hunt git-lrc - Free, unlimited AI code reviews that run on commit | Product Hunt

cognitive-orchestrator-toolkit

A sophisticated operational module engineered to facilitate deep-level cognitive scaffolding, strategic foresight, and recursive error correction within autonomous software entities. It promotes collaborative development paradigms and tackles intricate computational challenges via codified reasoning pathways, fostering dynamic and contextually appropriate agent behavior.

Author

cognitive-orchestrator-toolkit logo

nbiish

Other

Quick Info

GitHub GitHub Stars 2
NPM Weekly Downloads 7553
Tools 1
Last Updated 2026-02-19

Tags

aimcptoolscognitive toolstools nbiishcognitive workflows

◈──◆──◇ COGNITIVE ORCHESTRATOR MODULE (MCP) SERVER / ADVANCED 6-STEP META-REASONING ENGINE ◇──◆──◈


Project Patronage

Financial Transfer (Stripe Gateway)

Support via Stripe Transfer Point


◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

Groundbreaking MCP server featuring a Refined Dual-Pass, Hexa-Stage Deliberation Mechanism (Revision 10.0.2). The core deliberate utility activates an AI-Supervised Epistemic Advancement Protocol which directs Large Language Models to assess and nominate from a repertoire of 15 contemporary heuristic methodologies, quantified via a normalized metric ranging from 0.00 to 0.99 and applying a strict selection threshold of ≥1.53—only accepting inputs designated as input and context parameters. (Deployment schematics are detailed in latest.md and are governed by the accompanying [LICENSE].)

📢 TRANSFORMATIVE RELEASE (v10.0.2): Patched a severe internal variable lookup failure that manifested as a "ReferenceError: prompt is not defined" during procedural deliberations. The utility now robustly binds to the input argument across the entire cognitive pipeline, guaranteeing stable operation irrespective of the underlying LLM configuration or input constraints.

Aliases in Package Registries: - Indigenous Language Variant: @nbiish/gikendaasowin-aabajichiganan-mcp - Standardized Terminology: @nbiish/cognitive-tools-mcp

Both distribution containers receive concurrent feature parity and update synchronization. Select either package identifier for integration into your development environment.

Consult latest.md for the most recent integration specifications.

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

ᐴ ARCHITECTURAL MAP ᔔ [THE BLUEPRINT] ◈──◆──◇──◆──◈

Current System Cartography (v10.0.2):

text . ├── .cursor/ # Operational mandates and formatting directives │ ├── anishinaabe-cyberpunk-style.mdc │ └── rules/ ├── .github/ # Repository automation directives │ ├── copilot-instructions.md │ └── FUNDING.yml ├── build/ # Transpiled JavaScript artifacts │ └── index.js ├── new-flow/ # Conceptual documentation and visual aids │ ├── new-flow-images/ │ └── new-mcp-flow.md ├── src/ # Source code written in TypeScript │ └── index.ts ├── buymeacoffee-button.svg # Support mechanism graphic ├── CONTRIBUTING.md # Protocol for external involvement ├── latest.md # LLM Instruction Set (Licensed Content) ├── LICENSE # Stipulations for Use ├── modern-prompting.mdc # Definition corpus for heuristic techniques ├── package-cognitive-tools.json # Configuration for English package ├── package-gikendaasowin.json # Configuration for Indigenous language package ├── package.json # Root metadata file ├── PRD.md # Functional Specification Document ├── publish-both-packages.sh # Dual registry deployment utility ├── qr-stripe-donation.png # Monetary solicitation imagery ├── README.md # Primary documentation interface └── tsconfig.json # TypeScript Compiler Settings

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

ᐴ FUNCTIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ᔔ [CAPACITY UPGRADES] ◈──◆──◇──◆──◈

🚀 AI-Driven Epistemic Advancement (v10.0.2)

PATCHED IN v10.0.2: RESOLVED CRITICAL SYMBOL BINDING FAILURE

  • Critical Resolution: Eliminated the "ReferenceError: prompt is not defined" exception that inhibited LLM invocation.
  • Parameter Integrity: The core tool now correctly maintains reference integrity to the input argument throughout the entire deliberative construct.
  • Operational Stability: Eradicated runtime exceptions during LLM-initiated invocation of the orchestration utility.
  • Usage Flexibility: LLMs may now engage this MCP utility without concerns regarding input restrictions or execution halts.

Persistent Architecture (Since v8.9.6):

  • Model-Directed Assessment: The utility tasks LLMs with scoring cognitive heuristics dynamically, eschewing static evaluation assignments.
  • Genuine Flexibility: Absence of pre-calculated judgments; optimal methodologies are determined contextually by the model.
  • 15 Heuristic Methodologies: Full inventory of advanced prompting paradigms, spanning from Contextual Caching to Synthesized Multimodal Interpretation.
  • 0.00-0.99 Scoring Matrix: LLMs assign scores based on solution quality and execution efficiency, governed by the ≥1.53 quality gate.
  • Feedback Loop Integration: Embedded directives encourage post-execution return to the deliberation state for continuous refinement.

Advanced AI Guidance Architecture:

Delivery Phase of the Framework:

  • Hexa-Stage Structure: Comprehensive deliberation blueprint featuring targeted critical inquiry prompts.
  • Heuristic Corpus: Complete listing of the 15 advanced prompting strategies available for model vetting.
  • Scoring Protocol: Precise guidelines for the 0.00-0.99 scale, coupled with threshold-dependent methodology ratification rules.

LLM Processing Phase:

  • Adaptive Methodology Nomination: The LLM weighs and scores techniques relative to the immediate problem context.
  • Synergistic Combination: Multiple high-scoring techniques (≥1.53) are merged for amplified efficacy.
  • Toolchain Sequencing: Prescriptions on subsequent tool invocation frequency and recommended timing for re-evaluation.
  • Practical Application: Selected cognitive constructs are directly mapped onto the problem-solving execution layer.

Fundamental Advancement: This innovation empowers LLMs to self-determine their optimal reasoning pathways (meta-cognition) rather than adhering to rigid, predefined sequences, yielding truly context-aware and superior computational outcomes.

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

ᐴ OPERATIONAL BENCHMARKS ᔔ [PERFORMANCE INDICATORS] ◈──◆──◇──◆──◈

  • Model-Driven Evaluation: Directs LLMs to dynamically appraise and score 15+ cognitive paradigms.
  • Authentic Adaptability: Strategy selection is derived from contextual analysis, not static coding.
  • Meta-Cognitive Refinement: Models develop internal proficiency in choosing superior reasoning strategies.
  • Cyclical Optimization: Built-in mechanisms enforce continuous self-correction via tool cycles.
  • Quality Assurance: Adherence to the ≥1.53 metric ensures the deployment of only robust methodology groupings.
◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

🚀 AI-Driven Epistemic Advancement System (v8.9.6)

This fundamental revision transitions the deliberation utility from a static evaluation engine into an AI-Supervised Epistemic Advancement Protocol, facilitating genuine adaptive reasoning.

Core Breakthrough

Self-Regulated Selection: The system now mandates that LLMs analyze and choose heuristic methods internally, utilizing a structured 0.00-0.99 grading scale, enabling strategy selection tailored to the situation rather than relying on pre-set sequences.

Execution Topology

  1. Protocol Presentation: Deployment of the complete 6-stage meta-reasoning structure alongside targeted reflection prompts.
  2. Heuristic Index: Provision of the full set of 15 advanced cognitive paradigms for model scrutiny.
  3. Grading Schema: Instructions guiding the LLM through assessing execution fidelity and performance efficiency (≥1.53 threshold).
  4. Dynamic Nomination: LLM selects the most appropriate methods based on the specific requirements of the task.
  5. Implementation Directives: Provides guidance on tool utilization frequency and prompts for subsequent re-deliberation.

This advancement grants LLMs the capacity to independently refine and tailor their internal reasoning mechanisms, significantly amplifying their capacity for advanced computation!

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈
╭────────────[ ◈◆◇ CONSTRUCTION GUIDE ◇◆◈ ]────────────╮

ᐴ FABRICATION PROCEDURES ᔔ [BUILDING INSTRUCTIONS] ◈──◆──◇──◆──◈

bash ╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ │ ᐴ SHELL UTILITIES ᔔ [ EXECUTION SEQUENCE ] │ ╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Load necessary libraries

npm install

Compile the operational artifacts

npm run build

Local verification using the MCP Inspector

npm run inspector

Deployment script for both package manifests (Maintainer Privilege Required)

npm run publish-both

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

ᐴ APPLICATION GUIDE ᔔ [INTEGRATION] ◈──◆──◇──◆──◈

Desktop Agent Environment Configuration

In your claude_desktop_config.json manifest, include the following server definition:

{ "mcpServers": { "cognitive-orchestrator-toolkit": { "command": "npx", "args": ["@nbiish/cognitive-tools-mcp"] } } }

Accessible Utilities

deliberate - Advanced Dual-Pass, Hexa-Stage Processing Core (Revision 8.9.2)

  • Parameter Set:
  • input (Mandatory): The core challenge, query, or situational premise requiring cognitive review.
  • context (Optional): Supplementary background data or boundary conditions.
  • Automated Steering: Intelligently synthesizes the most effective cognitive trajectory and selects optimal heuristic sequences.
  • Output: Results derived purely from cognitive computation, naturally incorporating tool invocation counts.
  • Features: Dynamic heuristic vetting, Dual-Pass processing architecture, commitment to minimal auxiliary narrative.
╭────────────[ ◈◆◇ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ◇◆◈ ]─────────────╮

ᐴ SOURCING PROTOCOL ᔔ [CITATION/SHARING] ◈──◆──◇──◆──◈

Attribution for this module should utilize the following BibTeX entry:

bibtex @misc{cognitive-orchestrator-toolkit2025, author/creator/steward = {ᓂᐲᔥ ᐙᐸᓂᒥᑮ-ᑭᓇᐙᐸᑭᓯ (Nbiish Waabanimikii-Kinawaabakizi), also known legally as JUSTIN PAUL KENWABIKISE, professionally documented as Nbiish-Justin Paul Kenwabikise, Anishinaabek Dodem (Anishinaabe Clan): Animikii (Thunder), descendant of Chief ᑭᓇᐙᐸᑭᓯ (Kinwaabakizi) of the Beaver Island Band and enrolled member of the sovereign Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians}, title/description = {Cognitive Orchestrator Toolkit - Pioneering Dual-Pass Deliberation with Adaptive Prompting Strategy Selection}, type_of_work = {Indigenous digital creation/software incorporating traditional knowledge and cultural expressions}, year = {2025}, publisher/source/event = {GitHub repository under tribal sovereignty protections}, howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/nbiish/gikendaasowin-aabajichiganan-mcp}}, note = {Authored and stewarded by ᓂᐲᔥ ᐙᐸᓂᒥᑮ-ᑭᓇᐙᐸᑭᓯ (Nbiish Waabanimikii-Kinawaabakizi), also known legally as JUSTIN PAUL KENWABIKISE, professionally documented as Nbiish-Justin Paul Kenwabikise, Anishinaabek Dodem (Anishinaabe Clan): Animikii (Thunder), descendant of Chief ᑭᓇᐙᐸᑭᓯ (Kinwaabakizi) of the Beaver Island Band and enrolled member of the sovereign Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians. This work embodies Indigenous intellectual property, traditional knowledge systems (TK), traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), and associated data protected under tribal law, federal Indian law, treaty rights, Indigenous Data Sovereignty principles, and international indigenous rights frameworks including UNDRIP. All usage, benefit-sharing, and data governance are governed by the COMPREHENSIVE RESTRICTED USE LICENSE FOR INDIGENOUS CREATIONS WITH TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY, DATA SOVEREIGNTY, AND WEALTH RECLAMATION PROTECTIONS.} }

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

This module operates under the stipulations of the COMPREHENSIVE RESTRICTED USE LICENSE FOR INDIGENOUS CREATIONS WITH TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY, DATA SOVEREIGNTY, AND WEALTH RECLAMATION PROTECTIONS and adheres to the mandates outlined in CONTRIBUTING.md.

◈──◆──◇─────────────────────────────────────────────────◇──◆──◈

Copyright © 2025 ᓂᐲᔥ ᐙᐸᓂᒥᑮ-ᑭᓇᐙᐸᑭᓯ (Nbiish Waabanimikii-Kinawaabakizi), also known legally as JUSTIN PAUL KENWABIKISE, professionally documented as Nbiish-Justin Paul Kenwabikise, Anishinaabek Dodem (Anishinaabe Clan): Animikii (Thunder), a descendant of Chief ᑭᓇᐙᐸᑭᓯ (Kinwaabakizi) of the Beaver Island Band, and an enrolled member of the sovereign Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians. This work embodies Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions. All rights reserved.

== Overview == Business management systems encompass the entirety of computational assets, procedural controls, analytical solutions, and governing philosophies utilized by organizations to effectively navigate evolving market dynamics, maintain competitive advantage, and elevate overall corporate efficacy. These instrumentalities span departmental functions such as forecasting, process auditing, record maintenance, personnel oversight, critical decision support, and performance monitoring.

== Functional Taxonomy == Management tools can be categorized by their primary operational focus:

  • Utilities for initial data capture and validation across all functional units.
  • Mechanisms for the oversight and refinement of operational workflows.
  • Platforms for aggregating data insights and formulating strategic choices.

The rapid advancement of technology over the last decade has drastically altered the landscape of these business instruments, creating complexity in selecting optimal solutions for any given corporate setting. This is driven by persistent pressures to reduce operational expenditure, maximize revenue generation, deeply comprehend client requirements, and deliver requisite products precisely as specified. Consequently, executive leadership must adopt a strategic posture toward management tooling, prioritizing adaptation to organizational imperatives over the mere adoption of the newest available software.

== Prominent Methodologies (2013 Survey Snapshot) == The following tools represent high-usage strategies observed globally in 2013, reflecting adaptation to regional economic conditions:

Strategic planning, Client Relationship Management (CRM), Personnel satisfaction quantification, Comparative performance assessment (Benchmarking), Balanced Scorecard implementation, Core competency identification, Off-shoring/Outsourcing arrangements, Organizational transformation programs, Logistics network oversight, and Foundational vision/mission articulation, Market segmentation analysis, and Holistic quality assurance (TQM).

== Enterprise Software Applications == Software collections designed for business users to execute diverse corporate functions are termed business applications. These systems enhance productivity, provide quantifiable output metrics, and ensure precision in numerous operational tasks. The evolution moved from rudimentary Management Information Systems (MIS) to expansive Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), subsequently integrating CRM capabilities, culminating in the contemporary domain of cloud-based corporate management suites. Value addition to IT expenditure is maximized not only by the technical effort but crucially by the efficacy of the deployment strategy and the judicious selection and customization of the underlying tools.

== Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Focus == Tools tailored for SMEs are vital as they furnish accessible mechanisms for resource optimization and streamlined administrative overhead, allowing smaller entities to compete effectively.

See Also

`