Most AI Developer Tools Treat GitHub as the Center of the Universe. But We Use GitHub for Public Repos, and GitLab for Everything Else.

That should not be a problem.

But for a surprising amount of AI developer tooling, it is.

The default assumption is often simple:

Your code lives on GitHub.

That assumption breaks as soon as an organization has more than one Git host.

And there are many perfectly ordinary reasons to do that.

GitHub may be the home for open-source and public-facing repositories. GitLab may hold the company's internal code. A team may run Gitea for self-hosted or sensitive systems. Bitbucket may exist because of a customer, subsidiary, or legacy environment.

This is less about Git hosts and more about how organizations actually operate.

Think about your wallet

You can carry multiple bank cards for different accounts: one for day-to-day operations, another for payroll, another for a subsidiary, another for a specific business purpose.

One wallet. Multiple banks.

You would find it strange if a financial system said:

"We only work if all your money is in one bank."

You expect the system to work with the accounts you already have.

Code is similar.

Your repositories can have different homes for different reasons. The job of a code-review system is to review the code—not dictate where that code must live.

One review system. Multiple Git hosts.

That is why LiveReview takes a different approach.

We work across the Git infrastructure you already use:

GitHub. GitLab. Gitea. Bitbucket. Azure DevOps.

You do not have to move repositories to GitHub just to adopt AI code review. You do not have to consolidate your development infrastructure around another vendor's assumptions.

Your code can live in multiple places.

Your code review shouldn't have to.

Start free and plug LiveReview into the Git hosts you already run.

Related reading: LiveReview doesn't replace your workflow, it plugs into it covers how LiveReview fits around your existing tools instead of demanding you switch.