LiveReview Logo

LiveReview

Risk-Aware AI Code Review

No Unreviewed Commits

Developers aren't reading code anymore. What now?

LiveReview solves this with commit-time review: it sits inside git, reviews every change with risk-aware AI before it lands, records a reviewed-vs-skipped trail in git log, and keeps human judgment in the loop for every commit — including code written by AI agents.

AI is shipping mountains of buggy code.
Merge-time review is too late.
LiveReview adds a git-native protocol:
  • Review before every commit.
  • If you skip, it is explicit.
  • Git log records reviewed vs skipped (auditable trail).
  • Move from a believing culture to a checking culture.
Git-native protocolAuditable trail in gitCustom git cmd: git lrc review
Access LiveReviewEnterprise option
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket friendlyLocal-first CLI for uncommitted code
What makes LiveReview different
  • •Hooks directly into git so no commit slips past.
  • •Respects developer flow -- fast, no noisy bots.
  • •Works before PRs exist; complements PR reviews later.
  • •Great for AI-generated code: humans stay in the loop.

Solution

Human oversight for AI code

Keep humans in the loop without slowing them down. LiveReview makes review a lightweight, git-native reflex — before code lands. AI can write code; engineers decide what ships.

  • Review before commit; skips are explicit and auditable in git.
  • Works locally on uncommitted code and across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket.
  • No noisy bots — fast, developer-first loop.
Why it matters now
  • •AI is shipping buggy code; merge-time review is too late.
  • •Human judgment stays in control of every commit.
  • •Auditable trail in git: reviewed vs explicitly skipped.

The story in four frames

Four quick frames: the cost, why merge-time fails, the git-native flow, and the culture shift to checking before commit.

Frame

Hidden cost of unreviewed code

Unread commits quietly erode teams and quality.

  • Weakened understanding of changes.
  • Small mistakes pile into systemic issues.
  • Debugging skills fade without solid mental models.
  • Accountability drifts to 'the process'.

Frame

Traditional reviews arrive too late

Merge-time reviews are rushed and shallow by design.

  • Time pressure → shallow checks.
  • Authors already moved on; context is gone.
  • Reviewers lack fresh context.
  • Diffs are too large to reason about.

Frame

LiveReview meets code at the git layer

Git-native flow that fits daily dev loops.

Git-native protocolAuditable trail in gitCustom: git lrc review
  • Review is part of git, not an afterthought.
Git lrc review flow
git add .
git lrc review # (optional: --skip)
git commit -m "message"

Frame

From believing to checking

Shift from hopeful merges to verified merges.

  • Believing: commits land without review.
  • Enforce: use the CLI every time.
  • Reflex: reviewing becomes automatic.
  • Checking: code is reviewed before commit.

For teams

Built for developers, not bots

LiveReview keeps developers in control. Reviews are fast, local-first, and map exactly to git history. You decide how AI is used, and every commit stays accountable.

Tight git-level integration

Works with your repos and branches without forcing workflow changes.

Developer-first experience

Local CLI for uncommitted code and lightweight checks that avoid noisy bot spam.

Human oversight for AI code

Keep AI-generated changes reviewable and accountable before they merge.

Ready to eliminate unreviewed commits?

Start with the managed cloud, or deploy self-hosted for full control. Either way, every commit gets reviewed before it becomes tomorrow's incident.

Access LiveReviewEnterprise option